What will happen to TikTok in the U.S. after Trump’s first year?

/strong>. According to the available information, this entity is the vehicle through which TikTok completed the process to continue operating in the United States after the first year of Donald Trump’s administration.

The creation of the joint venture is no minor administrative detail. In the world of digital platforms, corporate structure is often a response to regulatory, political, or governance pressures. Here, moreover, the new firm reorganizes TikTok’s organizational chart in the country: it is not just “an office” or “a division,” but an entity with its own leadership.

That change in the organizational chart becomes tangible with an appointment: Adam Presser—who had spent nearly four years at TikTok as head of operations, trust, and safety—becomes the chief executive officer of the newly formed TikTok USDS Joint Venture. The choice of profile is revealing for what it suggests: continuity in the United States rests on a figure associated with operations and, especially, trust and safety, an area that is often at the center of public debates about platforms.

The joint venture is also presented as a mechanism that makes it possible to keep the platform running without isolating it from the rest of the world. This is important because TikTok does not operate as a set of national “islands” completely disconnected: its value for users and creators depends, to a large extent, on the circulation of trends, formats, and cultural references that cross borders.

In other words, TikTok USDS Joint Venture appears as a solution to sustain the U.S. operation under its own framework, without giving up the product’s global logic. The implicit challenge is twofold: on the one hand, to comply with the conditions that made this process necessary; on the other, to prevent the new structure from fragmenting the platform or significantly altering what users expect when they open the app.

New leadership at TikTok

The corporate reshuffle is accompanied by a change in command that, in practice, defines who will be responsible for executing TikTok’s strategy in the United States under the new TikTok USDS Joint Venture structure. The appointment of a chief executive officer for this entity marks a before and after: it is no longer solely a local operation within a global company, but a structure with its own leadership.

The appointment falls to Adam Presser, who had been serving at TikTok as head of operations, trust, and safety for nearly four years. That track record matters because it suggests continuity in the kinds of priorities the company considers critical to navigate the U.S. environment: operations, internal governance, and the issues that are usually grouped undor “trust & safety”.

In a context where TikTok’s continued presence in the United States was the subject of a process that culminates in the creation of a joint venture, leadership is not just a matter of day-to-day management. It is also a message: the company puts at the helm someone associated with areas that are often under public and political scrutiny.

The question that arises is how much this leadership will imply visible changes for the user. The available information suggests that the U.S. experience will remain aligned with the global one thanks to interoperability. If that holds true, the impact of the new CEO may be felt more “backstage”—processes, coordination, compliance—than on the product’s “frontstage.” But even when the user does not perceive a direct change, leadership can influence decisions that end up shaping what is recommended, how content is managed, and how external pressures are addressed.

In sum, the new leadership is a functional piece of the new scheme: someone must lead the joint venture and sustain the balance between service continuity, environmental demands, and coherence with the global operation.

Profile of Adam Presser

Adam Presser arrives at the executive leadership of the TikTok USDS Joint Venture with a recent track record within the company itself. According to the available information, Presser had spent almost four years at TikTok serving as head of operations, trust and safety.

That profile combines two dimensions that are often decisive for a platform under political and public pressure. On the one hand, “operations” refers to the ability to execute: coordinating teams, processes, and priorities so that the service runs consistently. On the other, “trust and safety” points to the set of policies and practices with which a platform tries to manage risks: from the integrity of the ecosystem to the way internal rules are enforced.

That a person with that background is chosen as CEO of the joint venture suggests that TikTok is seeking leadership with experience in sensitive areas, particularly in a country where the platform’s continuity required a specific process to keep operating. It is not a neutral appointment: it is a sign that the U.S. operation, under the new scheme, needs leadership with knowledge of the issues that tend to concentrate the debate.

It is also relevant that the change does not come from outside, but from within. Presser does not appear as an external “intervenor,” but as an executive who was already within TikTok’s structure. That can facilitate coordination with the global operation, especially if interoperability—promised as a key element—requires technical and product alignment.

On the board of the new TikTok in the United States, Presser represeninternal continuity, but with a different mandate: to lead an entity created precisely to ensure that TikTok continues operating in the country.

Functions of the new chief executive officer

As chief executive officer of TikTok USDS Joint Venture, Adam Presser is placed in charge of the entity that allows TikTok to continue operating in the United States after Donald Trump’s first year. Although the publicly available information does not detail a formal list of responsibilities, the context itself defines the scope of his role.

The first task is obvious: to run the U.S. operation under the new organizational chart. That implies ensuring that the joint venture functions as a real operating vehicle and not merely as a nominal figure. On digital platforms, “operating” means maintaining service continuity, coordinating teams, and ensuring that the product remains stable for users, creators, and brands.

The second function, implicit in the origin of the process, is to manage compliance with the conditions that made the creation of the joint venture necessary. In an environment where politics can affect the fate of a platform, the CEO becomes the point of articulation between corporate decisions and external demands.

The third responsibility follows from a key element: the joint venture will have interoperability with global operations. If the promise is that the U.S. user will have “the same experience as anyone else in the world,” leadership must ensure that this interoperability translates into effective coordination: that the product does not fracture, that the discovery of creators and brands on a global scale remains possible, and that the local operation does not become an isolated system.

Finally, Presser’s track record in “trust and safety” suggests that his role will also be associated with upholding internal standards in an area that is often the focus of debate. In sum: operate, comply, coordinate with the global organization, and preserve a consistent experience.

Interoperability with global operations

One of the most relevant points of the new arrangement is that TikTok USDS Joint Venture will have interoperability with TikTok’s global operations. Put simply: the U.S. operation is not conceived as a TikTok separate from the rest of the world, but as a local structure capable of connecting with the platform’s global system.

That interoperability has a direct consequence for the user: Americans will have the same experience as anyone else in the world. In the universe of social networks, “same experience” is not a minor phrase. It implies that the product —as the user experiences it— should not

transform into a limited, regionalized, or disconnected version. It also suggests that the dynamics that make TikTok particularly attractive—the rapid circulation of formats, sounds, trends, and references—will continue operating without a rigid digital border.

The dossier underscores a specific aspect: this interoperability is “relevant for the discovery of creators and brands on a global scale.” On TikTok, discovery is part of the heart of the service: the user not only consumes those they already follow, but also constantly finds new content. If the U.S. operation were to become isolated, that discovery could be diminished: less diversity of creators, fewer global trends, fewer chances for content to “cross” from one country to another.

For creators and brands, interoperability is also a promise of continuity: the possibility that a U.S. creator will be discovered outside the United States, and vice versa, without the new corporate scheme translating into an invisible wall. In an environment where global scale is part of TikTok’s value, maintaining that connection is almost a condition for competitive survival.

At the same time, interoperability poses an implicit challenge: coordinating a local operation with a global system without politics or corporate structure ending up imposing frictions. For now, the official message that emerges is one of continuity: TikTok is reorganizing to remain in the United States, but it is trying to preserve the global logic that underpins its appeal.

U.S. user experience

For the average user, the question “what will happen to TikTok?” is often translated into something more concrete: will I be able to keep using the app as always? The available information points to a reassuring answer: TikTok will continue operating in the United States and, in addition, the new company will have interoperability with global operations, which means that U.S. users will have the same experience as anyone else in the world.

That promise of continuity is especially important because the TikTok experience depends not only on the app being available, but on how its ecosystem works. The platform is built on discovery: opening TikTok is entering a stream of content where new creators appear, emerging trends, and formats that replicate at great speed. If the U.S. user will maintain the same experience, then the discovery “engine” should remain connected to the global one.

The dossier highlights precisely that point: interoperability is relevant for the discovery of creators and brands on a global scale. In practice, this means that a user in the United States should continue finding content that originates in othercountries, and that U.S. creators should retain the possibility of being seen outside their market. For brands, it implies that visibility dynamics would not be confined to a single territory.

There is also a psychological element: political uncertainty often generates anxiety in digital communities. When the idea takes hold that a platform could disappear or be radically transformed, users tend to anticipate losses: of audiences, of archives, of routines. Confirmation that TikTok will continue operating and that the experience will be equivalent to the global one works as a message of stability.

None of this implies that the user perceives the joint venture in their day-to-day. In fact, the goal of this type of restructuring is usually for the change to happen “behind the scenes” without altering the product. In that sense, the success of the new arrangement will be measured, paradoxically, by how little it is noticed: that TikTok remains TikTok for those who use it in the United States.

Impact of the Trump administration on TikTok

The fact that TikTok’s continuity in the United States is explained as happening “after the first year of Donald Trump’s administration” places politics at the center of the narrative. This is not a routine corporate adjustment: the platform “finally completed the process” to continue operating in the country through the creation of TikTok USDS Joint Venture. The phrase suggests a path involving pressure, negotiation, or conditions that had to be met.

In that context, the impact of the Trump administration is seen less in a visible change to the product—at least for now—and more in the type of solution adopted: a new corporate entity and a new organizational chart for the U.S. operation. That is, the political effect translates into structure.

It is also reflected in leadership. The appointment of Adam Presser, with experience in operations and in trust and safety, as CEO of the joint venture, can be read as a response to an environment where the platform’s legitimacy and governance are sensitive issues. When a platform is under scrutiny, “trust & safety” management stops being a technical area and becomes a point of public conversation.

The political impact is also measured by the need to ensure that the U.S. operation is sustainable without breaking with the rest of the world. Interoperability with global operations appears as a key promise: maintaining the same experience for the U.S. user and preserving the global discovery of creators and brands. In other words, the Trump administration influences the “how” TikTok organizes itself to stay, but TikTok tries to ensure that this influence does not turn into a fragmentation of the product.

At bottom, the case illustrates a recurring dynamic: digital platforms, when they come onto the rad ppolitical, they must demonstrate institutional adaptability. Here, that adaptation takes the form of a joint venture and specific leadership. The immediate result is operational continuity; the potential cost is that politics becomes a permanent factor in governance.

Reactions from users and the community

TikTok’s continuity in the United States is not only corporate news: it affects a broad community of users, creators, and brands that depend on the platform for entertainment, visibility, or cultural connection. In that sense, the implicit announcement—TikTok will not disappear and will continue operating through the TikTok USDS Joint Venture—serves as a calming message in the face of a scenario that, during the process, could have been perceived as uncertain.

Although no specific reactions are detailed in the available information, it is possible to outline the kinds of concerns that typically emerge when a platform faces structural changes for political reasons: whether there will be restrictions, whether content will circulate the same way, whether reach will be affected, or whether the experience will become different from that of the rest of the world. Precisely for that reason, the emphasis on interoperability and on “the same experience” seems designed to address those concerns.

For creators, the word “interoperability” has a practical meaning: not being locked into a single market. TikTok has been characterized by allowing trends and formats to travel quickly; if the U.S. user maintains the same experience as the rest of the world, then the community can assume that the global flow—key to discovery—will remain part of the product’s DNA.

For brands, continuity is also strategic. TikTok is a space where brands seek cultural relevance, and that relevance is often built with global references. Maintaining the worldwide connection helps ensure that campaigns, collaborations, and trends do not become strictly local.

At the level of the everyday user, the most important reaction is usually the quietest: continuing to use the app without noticing changes. On massive platforms, stability is measured by the absence of friction. If the joint venture meets its objective, the U.S. community should experience continuity: opening TikTok, discovering content, following creators, and participating in trends as before.

In sum, the community will likely read the move as a victory for staying power, but also as a reminder that the future of platforms can depend on political decisions and corporate structures.

Long-term outlook for TikTok

In the long term, TikTok’s case in the United States leaves a central conclusion: the platform can remain, but its permanence is conditioned by its ability to adapt institutionallyent. The creation of TikTok USDS Joint Venture is, in that sense, a solution that ensures continuity today, but also ushers in a new stage of governance.

The first perspective is that of operational stability. TikTok “finally completed the process” to continue operating in the United States, which suggests that the immediate chapter—the uncertainty over whether it would disappear—is now behind it. However, stability is not a permanent state: it will depend on the joint venture functioning as an effective structure and on leadership being able to maintain the balance between local requirements and global coherence.

The second perspective is that of the product. Interoperability with global operations is a strong promise: maintaining “the same experience” for the U.S. user. If that is fulfilled, TikTok preserves its competitive advantage: being a platform where discovery is global and where creators and brands can scale beyond borders. If that interoperability were to weaken, the risk would be fragmentation that affects the service’s appeal.

The third perspective is that of leadership. Adam Presser, with experience in operations, trust and safety, embodies a type of leadership aimed at managing tensions: service continuity, governance, and sensitive issues. In the long term, the success of this model will depend on the U.S. operation being able to sustain itself without politics imposing constant changes.

Finally, the case foreshadows a scenario in which digital platforms not only compete for users, but for institutional legitimacy. TikTok is reorganizing to remain in the United States; the challenge will be ensuring that this reorganization does not translate into a different experience or a loss of global connection. For now, the promise is continuity. The long term will tell whether the joint venture is a stable bridge or a temporary solution.

The future of TikTok in the United States: An in-depth analysis

The evolution of TikTok under the Trump administration

The evolution of TikTok in the United States during Donald Trump’s first year can be summed up in one fact: the platform does not disappear and finds a way to continue through the creation of TikTok USDS Joint Venture. That evolution is not technological in the first instance; it is institutional.

When a platform reaches a point where it needs to “complete a process” to keep operating, the most significant change usually occurs in its governance architecture. Here, the result is a new company and a new organizational chart for the country. In journalistic terms, this marks a shift: TikTok ceases to be just a local operation within a global structure and comes to rely on a specífica to sustain its presence in the U.S. market.

The Trump administration appears as the context that accelerates or conditions this transformation. No specific measures are detailed in the available information, but the temporal framing—“after the first year”—and the need for a process culminating in a joint venture allow one to infer that policy was a determining factor.

The evolution also includes a leadership change: Adam Presser takes over as CEO of the new entity. His profile, tied to operations and trust and safety, fits with a stage in which the platform needs to demonstrate management capability and internal control.

In sum, TikTok is evolving in the United States not through a reinvention of the product, but through a corporate reconfiguration that seeks to ensure continuity in a demanding political environment.

Impact on the user experience

The most important impact for the U.S. user, according to the available information, is that there should not be a disruptive impact. TikTok will continue operating in the United States and, thanks to interoperability with global operations, users will have “the same experience as anyone else in the world.”

That phrase encapsulates the promise: continuity of the product, continuity of discovery, and continuity of the connection to global trends. On TikTok, the experience is not limited to watching videos; it is about entering a recommendation and discovery system that connects creators, audiences, and brands. If interoperability is maintained, the U.S. user will continue to be exposed to that global flow.

The dossier underscores that this is relevant for the discovery of creators and brands on a worldwide scale. For the user, that means the content does not become “provincialized”: it is not reduced to an exclusively U.S. circuit. For creators and brands, it means that potential reach is not confined within borders.

In terms of perception, the best-case scenario for TikTok is that the user does not notice the joint venture. That the app opens, works, and recommends as always. The promise of “the same experience” points exactly to that: that the structural change happens behind the scenes.

Challenges and opportunities for TikTok in the U.S. market

The main implicit challenge is sustaining a local operation under a new structure without losing the coherence of the global product. The creation of TikTok USDS Joint Venture solves immediate continuity, but it raises execution questions: how interoperability is coordinated, how the org chart is managed, and how an experience equivalent to that of the rest of the world is maintained.

The opportunity, on the other hand, is clear: to remain in the United States with a framework that, at least for now, allows it to keep operating. In a marke

or key, continuity is an advantage in itself. Moreover, if interoperability works, TikTok preserves its value proposition: a global ecosystem where creators and brands can be discovered at worldwide scale.

Adam Presser’s leadership can also be read as an opportunity: a figure with experience in operations and trust and safety can prioritize stability and governance, two critical elements when a platform operates under scrutiny.

In short, the challenge is not to fragment; the opportunity is to consolidate permanence without sacrificing the product’s global character.

The influence of politics on digital platforms

The TikTok case illustrates how politics can shape a platform’s structure without necessarily changing its interface. Political influence here manifests in the need to create an entity —TikTok USDS Joint Venture— to continue operating in the United States after Trump’s first year.

In other words, politics doesn’t only regulate; it can also push companies to redesign their corporate architecture. That redesign, in turn, affects who makes decisions, how responsibilities are organized, and how continuity is negotiated.

The appointment of a CEO with experience in trust and safety also fits this logic: when politics comes into play, issues such as governance, integrity, and internal control take on greater weight.

The broader lesson is that digital platforms, due to their scale and cultural influence, become objects of institutional dispute. TikTok responds with a joint venture and with a promise of global interoperability. Politics, in this case, does not shut down the platform, but it does reconfigure the way it is sustained.

Long-term outlook for TikTok and its users

In the long term, TikTok’s future in the United States will depend on whether the joint venture achieves two objectives simultaneously: local stability and global continuity. Local stability is tied to having completed the process to continue operating. Global continuity hinges on interoperability and on the promise of an experience equivalent to that of the rest of the world.

For users, the desirable outlook is simple: that TikTok remains a space for global discovery. For creators and brands, the key is that reach and the circulation of trends are not limited by corporate borders.

Adam Presser’s leadership will be decisive in that equation. His prior experience in operations, trust and safety suggests the company is betting on leadership capable of managing tensions and sustaining governance.

In conclusion, TikTok is staying in the United States. The long term will tell whether this solution institucional becomes a stable model or an arrangement that must be renegotiated with every change in the political climate.

Transform the customer experience in your telecommunications company with Suricata Cx

Optimization of operating costs through automation

Suricata Cx is an AI-powered omnichannel customer experience platform, designed specifically for telecommunications operators and ISPs in the Americas and Spain. Its approach starts from a recurring problem in the sector: the high cost per interaction and the difficulty of scaling human support without driving up expenses.

Automation in Suricata Cx is geared toward repetitive, high-volume inquiries: billing, payments, incidents, service status, and account data. Instead of a “generic chatbot,” the proposal is a CX operating system with flows designed for real telecom processes.

The operational goal is to reduce agent workload and speed up response times, while maintaining human control when needed. This is supported by an automation engine that combines rules and AI, with external triggers (for example, system events) and controlled loops through to resolution.

Key: automate what is predictable to lower costs, without losing traceability or control when the case requires human intervention.

Improving customer satisfaction through agile support

In telecommunications, customer satisfaction often deteriorates due to long response and resolution times, channel fragmentation, and low first-contact resolution. Suricata Cx addresses these points with an omnichannel operation that unifies conversations and context, so the user doesn’t “start from scratch” every time they switch channels.

The platform incorporates conversational AI with persistent context and the ability to handle different formats (text, audio, image, video, and documents). In practice, this makes it possible to respond faster and with less friction, especially in typical industry scenarios: outage reports, balance inquiries, payment status, or reactivations.

In addition, the “human-in-the-loop” model allows AI to assist agents with pre-classification and context, and for the bot to pause and resume after a human intervention. This aims to raise quality without sacrificing speed.

Note: the hybrid approach (AI + human) is designed to scale without turning support into a black box: supervisors maintain control and auditing.

Boosting sales with artificial intelligence

Suricata Cx is not limited to support: it also covers sales and lead qualification

ds in channels such as WhatsApp, webchat, and social media. In telecom, an important part of conversion is lost due to response times and friction in the contracting process.

AI can guide conversations from start to finish: validate service availability, present preconfigured plans, and accompany the user along the purchase journey. The goal is to increase conversion without needing to proportionally increase sales headcount.

By operating in an omnichannel scheme, the sales conversation can continue wherever the customer prefers, maintaining traceability and context. This reduces “bouncing” between channels and improves the perceived experience.

In operational terms, the value lies in standardizing repeatable sales flows, leaving complex or high-value cases to human teams.

Payment recovery and efficient collections management

Collections and payment recovery are critical points for ISPs and telcos: they impact cash flow, churn, and operating costs. Suricata Cx incorporates conversational payment flows, automated reminders, and recovery journeys, with service reactivation after payment.

This component is supported by Pagoralia, a payment gateway specialized in ISPs and telecom, with capabilities such as recurring payments, industry-specific billing logic, and integration with ERP and CX. The idea is to reduce friction: that the customer can pay in the channel where they are already conversing and that the system reflects the event in real time.

The desired result is twofold: accelerate collections and reduce cancellations due to a poor payment experience or delays in reactivation.

Key: conversational collections + operational integration so that paying and restoring service is a continuous flow, not a fragmented procedure.

Omnichannel operations for a unified experience

Suricata Cx is positioned as a truly omnichannel operation: WhatsApp, webchat, social media, and IVR/voice, with a unified view for agents and managers. This addresses a typical problem: channel fragmentation that multiplies tickets, repetitions, and resolution times.

The platform offers full conversation traceability and operational metrics (for example, response and resolution times, recontact, SLA by contact reason). With native integrations and an API-first architecture, it seeks to synchronize data in real time: customers, debts, services, and tickets.

The focus is not only “being on many channels,” but operating with a single logic and a single context. In telecom, where the experience is often defined by how quickly issues are resolved, billing is clarified, or services are reactivated, that unification can be the difference between retaining or losing a customer.

In a scenario where TikTok seeks astability in the U.S. without breaking its global logic, it is clear that the continuity of a platform depends as much on politics as on governance and day-to-day operations. At Suricata Cx we closely follow these changes because, for telcos and ISPs, the lesson is similar: when the environment becomes more demanding, the difference is made by an omnichannel operation with traceability, human control, and automation applied to real flows. Understanding how TikTok is being restructured helps anticipate how user and regulator expectations will evolve regarding security, experience, and consistency across channels.